Merry Christmas

Thank you all for your support and interest over the past year.  To every one of our readers, supporters and fellow nationalists in general, we wish you all a very merry Christmas, a safe holiday and a happy, healthy and productive 2013.  Let us all hope that this coming new year brings us closer to our goals and that, through our efforts, it will be a year that sees the continued growth of the nationalist message and further victories for our Party and our movement.

Book Review: Cannibal Capitalism

“Cannibal Capitalism”

By Michael C. Hill.

They used to say that people who used a lot of fancy words to say very little had “swallowed a dictionary.” Michael C. Hill seems to have swallowed the “Wall Street Journal.”

Michael C. Hill is, he tells us, the son of a bona fide rocket scientist, who worked at NASA on the space program. After sacrificing his marriage to his career, the elder Hill was put out of a job by the contraction of space exploration after the big excitement of the moon landings. Young Michael, like a lot of us, was determined not to repeat Dad’s mistakes.

He became a capitalist just in time to lose all his money in the Great Financial Crisis of 2008. Now he has written a book called “Cannibal Capitalism” to explain to us where we all went wrong.

There is not a word in the book that I have found to indicate that he is a Negro, but this is coyly revealed by a photograph on the inside back of the dust cover – the book is a hardback.

Michael apparently doesn’t know anything about what is called “fiat money” and the history of corrupt economics – they wouldn’t tell him that at college. He thinks he knows about “capitalism,” and having played the game according to the rules he was taught in college and lost, he has decided, of course, that the rules should be changed. Nobody told him that the rules had been changed way back in the year 1914, and that is when corruption entered the system.

Without going into the details of economic theory, it is certainly possible to argue that all the corrupt banking practices and laws that have been introduced since 1914 amount to an attempt by immensely wealthy families to hold onto their power. One can suspect the Windsors, the Rockefellers, the Rothschilds, and the rest of them of having a hand in the unscrupulous banking laws and the bogus socialist political rhetoric which have helped to preserve the power of these ruling families by freezing people into the class into which they were born.

But Michael C. Hill has apparently never heard of any of this. He thinks the system is a machine that needs tinkering with, and having been to “college” and read all the manuals, he thinks he is just the boy to do the tinkering. He has managed to get a book on the shelves along with Nouriel Roubini and all the other supposed intellectuals who are busy explaining to us how they can tinker with the system better than the next tinkerer. One might almost think they were a bunch of out-of-work mechanics.

In our system, we are supposed to have freedom of speech and publication, so it isn’t always possible to keep people from speaking or writing truth. What you can do, if you are a corrupt Establishment, is to make sure that the words of truth are drowned in an ocean of falsehoods. That is the real function of books like this one by Michael C. Hill, the good Negro, son of another good Negro, both of whom played by whitey’s rules and lost.

Movie Review: Inside Job

Inside Job is a documentary movie dealing with the Subprime Crisis and the following Global Financial Crisis. This movie was produced written and directed by Charles Ferguson with Sony Pictures 2011 and is narrated by Matt Damon.

Running for approximately 2 hours, Inside Job begins with a short examination of financial and political events in Iceland prior to the meltdown. It continues with a thorough examination of what occurred in especially the USA leading on to the eventual 2008 GFC ( Global Financial Crisis ).

The beauty of Inside Job is in its simplicity. It is not a movie exclusively for those well versed in finance and economics, it is presented at a level that most people, irrespective of their station in life will easily understand. The methods used build from one stage to the next and provided the viewer remains alert ( you can always replay individual scenes ) the rewards of new knowledge are without bounds.

Inside Job examines, the banks, the insurance companies, the financial trade, the stock exchanges, the politicians, the academics and the regulators and from this writers point of view at least, finds them all wanting. Inside Job digs up the real issues and puts the hard questions to the right people, some of whom are very noticeable by their unavailability to answer questions and some by the way in which they responded to fair questions. Get the story on what really happened.

The final message of Inside Job is a concerning one. It proposes that despite the promises of politicians, especially the US President, necessary change is not apparent and it infers that the whole exercise could be repeated.

If you don’t think that you could possibly understand the details of the financial and banking world, think again. Get a hold of Inside Job and treat yourself to some raw information that exposes the decision makers and the benefactors. You won’t regret it. Highly Recommended.

Almost Compulsory Viewing.

Inside Job can be rented from most Video outlets and it is available for purchase online.

David Penberthy and his smears – the Greens, the September 11 truthers and me

Dr. Jim Saleam


Editor's note: the following item was received a few weeks ago and is still entirely relevant.  It is published as received, however readers need to take into account references therein to the timing of the events described which are relative to the time the article was written and not to the date of publication.  The delay in publication is entirely the fault of your humble editor!

David Penberthy, scribbler at the Courier-Mail and Sunday Mail has over the last couple of weeks taken my name in vain in a newspapers’ war against the NSW Greens Senator, Lee Rhiannon.

The story was that Senator Rhiannon met with Mr. John Bursill, a man who questions the official story and seeks ‘the truth’ about the September 2001 Twin Towers attacks in New York. It was then said that I had previously invited Mr. Bursill to address the Sydney Forum (variously described as a creation of the Australia First Party and an assembly of ‘far right activists’). It was then the smear that there is some ‘link’ between myself and Senator Rhiannon and she fails some credibility test via a ‘link’ with me. I could also say I might fail a credibility test via a link with her.

I note this horse manure has appeared also in The Australian newspaper over the last two weeks also. Why it should be that the papers have launched a broadside at Rhiannon I cannot say, but the truth around David Penberthy smells.

On September 23 the following appeared under Penberthy’s pen:

Lee Rhiannon: She can’t handle the truth(ers)

“Despite her left-wing convictions, Rhiannon went ahead and held a meeting with Bursill at the same time he had given an address to another meeting of right-wing extremists to push his truther views. The meeting was called the Sydney Forum and was a gathering of Far Right activists organised by a lapsed Nazi called Jim Saleam, the former head of the cheerily named National Socialist Party. “

Lovely. Unfortunately for Penberthy, I have never been the “former head” of the “cheerily named” National Socialist Party, a group which did exist in Australia, but which disappeared in 1975. I have observed that other journalists have insisted since that it does exist, but other than citing a few ex-agents of the discredited one-time Special Branch police making such claims, no evidence has really been produced. Of course, the journalists at issue knew whom they were quoting, which raises serious questions, all made worse because it has sometimes been me who has told them of this fact – but let us not stray too far from peeling back Penberthy’s falsity. Raising too many points about why journalists simply lie would be a book.

Penberthy’s bile prompted Senator Rhiannon to write in the Sunday Mail (September 30)

Greens senator says column incorrect:

David Penberthy (SM, September 23) made a serious mistake when he claimed that I attended and spoke at "a gathering of Far Right activists organised by a lapsed Nazi called Jim Saleam, the former head of the cheerily named National Socialist Party." This is false.

I have acknowledged I met with "truther", John Bursill. The Australian newspaper asserted that this person may have attended a meeting of the Sydney Forum. To then conclude that I attended this event or was associated with it is ludicrous.
- Lee Rhiannon, Australian Greens Senator for NSW

I have clashed with Penberthy before when he was editor at the Sydney Daily Telegraph, after I was smeared by a gutless ‘anti racist’ called Joe Hildebrand. I lost two cases against Hildebrand at the Press Council and won another, prompting Penberthy to berate me for taking cases there anyway. Of course, at the Press Council, wins and losses don’t mean too much as ‘truth’ ain’t really the issue there. Nonetheless, complaints can serve a useful purpose, although the best defence against journalist liars is never to talk to them at all.

But the hot story about this smear-monger goes back in time to Adelaide University in the 1980’s. Back then, Penberthy was a Trotskyite communist, a position from which he lapsed (sic) in the pursuit of the status and money a mainstream job surely holds. The story goes that either Penberthy personally, but certainly his closest friends, challenged violently two members of the nationalist organisation, Nation Action, which I then co-directed. Sadly, the Trotskyite gang picked the wrong two blokes and their defence against assault left bloodied noses and bruises.

Do I detect the smell of a journalist’s revenge? Is it that Penberthy can never resist a chance to tell some tall tale about me?

As nationalist politics develops in Queensland under the auspices of the Australia first Party, I have little doubt that David Penberthy will be there, his computer keyboard burning with his own ‘truth’ and his pen dripped in toilet water.

Property Rights

Your reporter recently (29th-30th June 2012) attended the annual meeting, in Rockhampton Queensland this year, of Property Rights Australia, a group of which he has been a very ordinary member for a number of years, usually without attending anything.

Young nationalists may wonder what a property rights group has to do with the interests of nationalists. This is one of those matters that aren’t what they appear to be, to a casual glance. Secure property rights are one of the things that make the difference between a civilised country and an uncivilised one.

Without going into a lot of romantic stuff about our Christian heritage and the gradual development of “law and order” and the protection of the individual down through the centuries, it is still true, generally speaking, that our rellies in Europe and North America have secure property rights, and the dwellers in the uncivilised world do not.

In the uncivilised world, generally speaking, individuals do not have property: they are property. Their superiors own them. This is of course also the position of, for example, soldiers, even in the civilised world.

The first property right for the individual is the right not to be the property of someone more important, or of a group or commune. Communists disregard property rights, and even their highest leaders, once fallen from grace, have no practical rights against collective decisions. Lenin himself was strictly supervised, told what he could and could not write, in his last days.

The existence of people with secure property rights is a great hindrance to power-hungry governments. They do everything they can to whittle property rights away.

At present the stress point for property rights is the “global warming” story concocted by the environmentalists. It is claimed that the deadly danger of global warming makes it necessary for governments to override property rights. This drives people who own real property (land) wild: they never know what rights are going to be taken away next.

One of the differences between Communists and Fascists is that Communists seize property, but Fascists tell you it is still yours and you are still responsible for it, but they will tell you what you can and can’t do with it, often in considerable detail. Our democratic governments today are very much fascist governments. They have even taken over the family, telling parents increasingly what they can and cannot do with their children, while still holding the parents responsible if the children go wrong.

That is the great joke of the twentieth century: Mussolini and Hitler were denounced as evil men, and their armies were defeated, but the principles they had in common were increasingly adopted by their erstwhile enemies.

Today, we in Australia are the property of the worldwide collective. The plan is apparently to breed us out of existence, in favour of other races who for one reason or another enjoy the favour of the higher groups (pseudo-intellectuals and sentimentalists) who own us. (We might recall the replacement of Hereford cattle by Zebus forty years ago as an analogy.) We do not have property: we are property, and we are junk property at that. Our owners are planning to switch brands.

The Olympic ideal doesn't extend to freedom of thought

In a move that reveals the true nature of political oppression in the world today, the German Olympic Committee is to send German rower Nadja Drygalla home because it is alleged that her boyfriend is an official in the German political party NPD (National Democrats) -- a party considered by its opponents to be "neo-Nazi".

Read the full report here:
http://www.smh.com.au/olympics/off-the-field/german-rower-sent-home-due-to-neonazi-links-20120803-23lbd.html#ixzz22Uo8gkIV

We draw readers' attention to the following statement from German Olympic Committee official Michael Vesper: "If she confirms that she has nothing to do with (the far-right), why shouldn't she continue (to compete for Germany)?"

Attentive readers will notice that implicit in this statement is the simple fact that if she does in fact have any involvement personally in the "far-right", then her career is over.  This should surprise no-one.  The SMH article also mentions that her relationship was the reason for her resignation from the German police.  We might conclude that the resignation was not entirely a matter of choice, but the article does not specify.

Michael Vesper, incidentally, was until 2006 a German politician representing the far-left party Alliance 90/The Greens.

An announcement regarding the Australia First email account

It has been brought to the attention of Australia First organisers that the official email contact for the Queensland Branch of the Party (afpqld@hotmail.com) is no longer being maintained.  Unfortunately, this has led to the suspension of the account in question.  This matter has been rectified, however a consequence of the suspension is that any emails received before the suspension occurred have been lost and cannot be recovered.

We understand that this is frustrating to all concerned, but request that anyone who has raised any important matters with us at this email address please re-send your email.  We guarantee that it will be answered promptly.  It is our firm resolve to put this unfortunate incident behind us by ensuring an efficient and businesslike service to all enquirers and supporters from this time forward.