The Theft of a Nation.

Who sold Australia and who bought it?


The who, what, when, why and how? Of our betrayal.


The accused? Not yet in the dock!


Gough Whitlam (Fabius Maximus), Robert Hawke, Malcom Fraser, Paul Keating, John Howard and Kevin Rudd. Every one of them by their actions can be considered to be an international socialist. The nett end result of their policies has been a sociological disaster for Australia and her people.


They have presided over the destruction of the family, the economy, justice, and morality. They have presided over the disarmament of the people, while all the time pretending to protect the family and the nation. AND IF YOU ARE NOT ACTIVELY OPPOSING THEM YOU ARE COMPLICIT!! You are part of the problem, as long as you continue to “sit on the fence” opt out, or give up. Not just defeated, but actually guilty of aiding and abetting this betrayal. If only by your passive acquiescence to these unwanted, unjust and undenmocratically arrived at policies, most of which would not have passed a peoples referendum.


We the people of the nation have allowed this to happen. In truth we have become; “DOPED DOWN UNDER”, by being compelled to vote for our destruction as a viable, cohesive, independent, sovereign nation. Unbeknown to most Australians compulsory voting exists in only two other nations. Those being Belarus and Belgium. The leading democracies such as Britain, U.S.A. , France, Greece, Italy, etc. All have an unforced democratic vote. It is hard to imagine those peoples be so passive as to allow their governments to compel a person to vote. In the recent elections in Russia, president Putin asked the Russians to go out and vote, in our last Australian elections, we were ordered to.


In Queensland our local government boundaries and system were changed, without reference to the people by referendum, once again it will appear to the foreign observer, that the people agreed. The truth is, yet again, the people had NO CHOICE!! The difference between rape and consent is free choice, one might draw a parallel here between a compelled vote and a democratic free vote.


Statistics tell us that the vast majority of rape victims do not choose to conceive or give birth, when given a choice. When a vote is the result of threats of a person being fined and maybe jailed, and a law that permits a so called dissident to be jailed, for advising people “not to vote:, then Australia cannot really pretend to be a democracy. Voting under duress can never be considered democratic.


Since the inception of the compulsory vote, Australian governments may have had some sort of a mandate, but the one mandate they didn’t have, was a democratic one. This is not to say that an immediate or sudden change would have occurred, but without doubt over the decades, as Australians came to see what the socialists were intending, and many would have re entered the public political arena, as and when they perceived how little public support there is in fact for many of our governments’ policies.


Under the current A.E.C structure it is verging on the impossible to register and sustain and create a new party. The reader may well ask, What difference would a democratic vote have made? I will give 2 examples. Assuming that politically active people that join a new party will vote, and that in a free election, maybe about 50% WONT. Then the vote for a new party, with new leaders and policies will be maximised and democratic change or regression can occur according to the will of the people.


A visit to the national archives or wherever these records are held would show, that based on these assumptions that Confederate Action Party with .62 of a quota in 1993 on about 60% voter turnout, would have won a senate seat so would Mrs. Hanson, on her first attempt, (prompting me to wonder why she reportedly, supports the compulsory vote). Sometimes people don’t realise when they are being robbed I think that Mrs. Hanson has plenty of company in this respect.


Given that there are basically only 3 ways for power-government to change ie: Invasion; Revolution: or orderly political process ie: Democracy. And that in simple terms wars have been fought on 3 main issues; Race, Resources and Religion. It will be interesting to see what will happen in and to Australia and Australians; if the current “pretend democracy” continues, and an increasingly dumbed downed public come to realise that they have been duped, come to realise that the government has abandoned our religion, sold our resources, and betrayed our people. One reads that in 1971, 19 Australians were working to keep one person on welfare, whereas now we have 5 working, to keep 2 on welfare and with millions queuing to get into Australia the situation can only worsen. Certainly, stupidity is no crime, but treason most certainly is.


I am supporting the Australia First Party and hope that it will grow well past the 100,000 membership, which would then probably outnumber the combined memberships of Labor, Liberal, Nationals etc. I support Australia First because it is both genuinely nationalist and Democratic, Australia First will have Citizens Initiated Referendum and Recall and Australia First has indicated that it will support A.D.D.I.C.T. Associations’ strategies, re. The drug war currently NOT being fought as reported in “The Australian 23/10/09 Afghan Opium kills 100,000 people a year”.

Perry Jewell Australia First Queensland.

The Voice - Multiculturalism : The Globalist Agenda (Video)

Party Leader agrees with blogger's view.

 Mike Neville Traitor?

Weekend Advertiser 16.01.10


The state leader of a far right political party has endorsed the views expressed by an anonymous blogger who describes Griffith mayor Mike Neville as a "traitor".


Dr Jim Saleam heads the NSW Branch of the Australia First Party a Nationalists body with core policies that include reducing and limiting immigration and abolishing Multiculturalism.


While he would not reveal the identity of the author of the online blog entitled Australian Identity, which hits out at the regions cultural mix and use of contract labor, Dr Saleam said he was aware of the individual and fully supported what they had to say.


He said he had a long history with Councilor Neville and fully agreed with the bloggers sentiment that he is a "traitor" and has a love of contract labor. "I've actually had a lot of dealings with Mr. Neville going back about six years" he said. "We clashed over the contract labor issue and I was actually challenged by Dino Zappacosta to a debate, but he pulled out, so whatever the blogger had to say I am quite critical about Mike Neville".


Dr. Saleam, who has a PHD in politics said contract labor merely created jobs for refugees and migrants, pricing Australian born workers out of the market.


"It's a practice that's designed to drive down the price of labor, they say that's not true but that's exactly what it does," he said.


"The trade and contract labor attracts a type of evil character Australia can do without".


In Canberra yesterday to register AFP as a political party, Dr. Saleam said he was not concerned about being labeled a racist "Quite frankly my dear, I don't give a damn, I think it's well beyond that now, I don't have any malice in my heart," he said.


Wagga city councilor and Greens Party member Ray Goodlass was yesterday infuriated by some of the comments made on the locally written blog and by Dr. Saleam.


He said "the inclusion of an AFP representative on council could only be a negative for the residents of Wagga, with the needs and concerns of some community members not considered valuable. "I think that would be a really retrograde step," he said. "I think councilors need to be looking after all of their residents and the AFP would be very de-evolutionary and exclude members of our community".

General Cosgrove Levels Verbal Guns At Patriotic Australians.

General Peter Cosgrove used his Australia Day address (January 19), to make various criticisms of patriotic Australians.


General Cosgrove supported the maintenance of high immigration and said Australia should not be tempted to cut it.


General Cosgrove condemned the nationalist Civil Uprising at Cronulla in 2005 as a matter of “criminality” and equated this event to recent physical attacks upon Indian students (which incidentally are generally carried out by non-European persons).


General Cosgrove criticised “racist elements” (patriotic people angered by immigration and its results) in our society as illegitimate in their views and appeared to equate a category of Australian to an exercise in social “criminality”.


The entire speech seemed dedicated to buttressing the traitor class line on Australia’s demographic future. It was a slippery product, complete with a definition of patriotism as something related to helping neighbour countries and integrating migrants.


General Cosgrove’s speech was sad in that the ordinary Australian might expect either neutrality of opinion, or a patriotic stance from a former soldier. Unfortunately, such an expectation would be naïve.


It is necessary to understand that the hierarchy of Australia’s military has no real allegiance to Australia. It is committed to its foreign policy “alliances” and its military “allies”. It has spent so long sending young Australian men (and more recently, women) into harm’s way at the behest of foreign powers, that it has no model of patriotism left. If an Australian movement arose which questioned the virtue of maintaining our alliances and dying for our allies, it is not too hard to figure where the loyalty of the Cosgrove-type would lie.


In attacking the Australian patriotic perspective and Australian youth, General Cosgrove forgot his own morality. This man commanded the Australian army during the criminal invasion of Iraq. He has never forsworn this enterprise carried out to serve Israel and the American and other multinational corporations and oil companies. He has never asked too serious a question about the war crimes of his allies, crimes that went back to the use of nuclear weapons (depleted uranium ammunition). We cannot expect that he would.


The Australian people observe that important figures like General Cosgrove are put up in public by the traitor class to lend endorsement to their treason against the Australian People. Rather than win points for that class, the sad intervention of General Cosgrove in the national population / immigration debate only serves to demonstrate to Australians the venal nature of the class and its policies.

Long Live The Southern Cross! Australia First Replies To Culture-Buster Warwick Thornton

Southern Cross used like swastika - filmmaker.  Full story Here.

Film Maker bites the hand that feeds him.

Warwick Thornton, a filmmaker, who has been chosen as the Northern Territory's nomination for Australian of the Year, has launched a vicious attack upon the emblem of the Southern Cross.


He said: “I'm starting to see that star system symbol being used as a very racist nationalistic emblem - and that is seriously worrying me”. “We don’t want to turn the Southern Cross into a swastika – that’s bloody important.”


It is a fact that young Australians carry the National Flag and the Eureka Flag at parties, sports’ events and public occasions; many have tattooed themselves with the star-constellation, or the cross design. The symbol has truly become a tribal expression of Australian identity. No wonder it has been assailed by this traitor class representative – just as Australia Day approaches.


What the globalising, cultureless, masters of the geographic space they call Australia, fear above all else, is the emergence of a movement that openly proclaims a native identity for the European population here. This population has that identity, which stretches back to the first articulation of ‘Australianness’ at the Eureka Stockade and then through to the radical nationalist upsurges at Lambing Flat (1861), the Barcaldine Revolt (1891) and further on into the great achievements of ANZAC and Kokoda. In the lost deserts of multiculturalism, the Australian People are re-finding themselves. Against those trying to bust our culture in the suburbs, all social institutions and in rural Australia, a spirit of resistance is building. The Southern Cross is the symbol of that resistance.


A political movement must be built. No wonder Warwick Thornton prattles on about the swastika. He is trying to build a Great Wall between the mass of awakening ‘tribal’ Australian people (especially the youth) and any movement which builds the nationalist resistance. Smearing the Southern Cross is an act of desecration.


On Australia Day, the Australia First Party will be active. Other patriotic groups will also come out publicly to proclaim their Australianity.


The National Flag and the Eureka Flag will be held high.

People are frightened by logic.

The Voice - By Boat (Video)

In this episode we take a look at the growing problem of so-called asylum seekers making their way illegally into Australia waters and being cared for at your expense. In 2009 some 62 boats carrying 2,727 passengers made their way into Australian waters, how many will there be in 2010?


The only intelligent and far cheaper option than spending Australian taxpayer's money on housing the illegal aliens on Christmas Island and soon to be Darwin and then ultimately in the community is to protect Australia's borders but that is never going to happen as long as we have bleeding hearts in positions of power who care more about the welfare of foreigners than that of Australians. Charity begins and ends at home!