Our True Heroes

They were the ones that could smell and taste the blood, smell the cordite, hear the screams of pain in the dark. They were the ones that put their lives on the line to keep our country free for the coming generations. They are the ones now that have been abandoned by both of the major parties whilst the politicians suck massive amounts of money out of our system in superannuation and other benefits. Politicians that have failed us and our country but still reward themselves whilst our ex-service people, some who gave their lives for us, and their widows and widowers do it hard. For God’s sake these people went to war to keep this country free, to insure that you would have a lifestyle that is near perfect but for a few hiccups. We have to look after these people first and foremost. We have to insure that they have what they earned, what they deserve. They need to have the comforts of life without the stresses that are being put on them by government not passing on rises in costs of living expenses. You and we have to insist that our ex-service people, their spouses or widows or widowers are treated as our heroes. They are true heroes not some football player that kicks a football around for hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. Our real heroes, the ones that fought for our country, died for our country, tried to keep our country free, only to see their own governments sell them out and allow our country to be sold off or invaded by illegals. The ones that came home with problems that they obtained from fighting and dying for our country. I along with our team of people from Australia First will make a commitment to insure that our heroes of the past and future are looked after. Our Soldiers, our Sailors, Army, Navy and Air Force and their widows/ widowers and families are treated fairly and with respect. I will push for all of their pensions to be restored to a fair level and to have all CPI increases passed on. We have a team for the Lower house and people for the Senate and we will bring Australia back to her former glory and we will look after our true heroes, heroes like the ones I met today at the RSL home village. From myself, I personally say thank you for your sacrifice.

Peter Schuback

Senate Candidate for the Australia First Party

0408 458 232

Mineral and Mine Movers transport

Peter Schuback: A Statement on the Refugee Question

Some people have made comments in regards to my stand on refugees that are invading our country. Some have put forward the argument that they are just poor people trying to escape their own countries.

And yes they are trying to escape their own countries. But refugees they are not, they are opportunists that are invading our country for economic gain.

A true refugee has nothing, they have usually been in some disgusting camp with none of their possessions for many years and they have no money.

The ones that are coming here have money and in some cases lots of it. They pay for air flights and then somewhere to stay whilst they travel from their country of origin to get to Australia and pay up to and sometimes well above $ 20,000 per head to get on some leaky boat to travel here. How many true refugees carry near-new laptop computers?

How many even have a passport to throw overboard when they get to Australia.

When these invaders get here they have to be processed by our Navy first and foremost and then they have to be accommodated. They get given health care cards, they get given money, they get given a place to live and most go straight on the dole.

Some have many diseases like aids and TB that creates and extra burden on our health care system and that put the Australian people that have paid taxes all their lives further down the waiting list.

How many of you have walked into a Centrelink office and walked out with the same benefits that these illegal invaders get?

So my comments to stop these people from coming here was to put them straight back on a plane and send them back to where they came from without passports so they can neither enter their own countries nor re-invade ours. It is harsh but we need to send a message to these people that they will not be accepted in our country and we have to stop kissing the arse of the UNITED NATIONS. This is Australia. It is our country and we will invite who we want and not accept any more of the world's scum with their crazy religions and attitudes that we owe them and that do not respect us or our way of life.

Peter Schuback

Senate Candidate for the Australia First Party Queensland 0408458232

One Nation Queensland Refuses To Preference Australia First And Calls Us A “Racist” Party

The Australia First Party Senate team led by Peter Schuback was more than pleased to have Jim Savage, One Nation Queensland tough man, denounce us as a “racist party” and decline to grant us Senate preferences.

We have waited a long while for One Nation to come out into the open.

One Nation likes to pretend things in front of the public and mislead as to its position but now it gets down to tick-tacks.

Australia First party had correspondence with One Nation and other words have passed between us and now these words have come from Mr. Savage. So we say to our supporters and voters, the following:

If it is “racist” to advocate an utter end to refugee migration, well and good.

One Nation, despite certain words, does not advocate a total end to refugee migration. They advocate “offshore processing” for “genuine” refugees.

If it is “racist” to demand that the refugee hordes that have entered Australia since say the time Mrs. Hanson went into Parliament, well and good.

One Nation has refused to say that it wants these people sent home, with our goodwill and assistance.

If it is “racist” to say that the Nation is a European one and that we oppose the ethnic cleansing of our people, well and good.

One Nation has been remarketing itself as a party of universal assimilation.

Whatever it was Pauline Hanson and One Nation were years ago – they certainly are not now.

This party is a sham.

Although we accept that many Australians do not know this and may not approve of our words, we have seen many former One Nation members move into Australia First precisely for that reason.

In this election and in the political struggles in the community and at the street level, Australia First will push One Nation off whatever common territory there may be between the two parties.

Thank you Jim Savage for ‘despising’ us (sic). If it is “racist” to put Australia and Australians first – and we suppose that can only mean “white” people first – then we are happy to leave One Nation far behind.

Australia First Party Declines To Preference One Nation: What The ‘Mike Holt Affair’ Has Taught Us.

Australia First Party Senate candidate Peter Schuback has advised that the party cannot direct preferences to One Nation.

The recent ‘Mike Holt affair’, where a One Nation candidate came to fame last week after he issued some stickers criticising Islam and claimed that a “Halal tax” operated on foodstuffs which would go to fund terrorism – was the catalyst for free-speaking on our part.

The sad Mike Holt inspired a Brisbane girl who placed the stickers upon food products in a supermarket; she was arrested for creating a food-safety panic. Naturally, Holt first abandoned her. But then, the party adopted her and made her a candidate (something she was unwise to accept) and then abandoned her again.

The whole issue ran deeper than some stickers about Islam.

The affair had useful fallout and has highlighted the crucial difference between Australia First Party and One Nation and why the parties are now struggling over actual political space, that gap which allows some sort of pro Australian party to claim the loyalty of voters and activists. It is not any matter of personalities, but one of fundamental ideas.

Peter Schuback said:

“One Nation is not a nationalist party; they are some type of conservative group. They voice people’s concerns but advance only open-ended slogans and have promised to side with the Liberal Party if elected. They are a safety valve, not a challenge to the system. Conservatism cannot win the fight for Australian independence, nor guarantee the actual ethnic survival of our Australian People in the emerging multi-racial mess. Indeed, conservatism isn’t designed to do that. In this election and afterwards, we will fight One Nation over the terrain and push them off. We will work harder to disintegrate One Nation, winning over any sincere people and consigning the leadership back to the LNP where they belong.”

Of course, One Nation’s playing on the danger of Islam is easy. Yes, Islam represents a crass challenge to Australian identity and lifestyle and Muslim activists and their culture are a visible issue. We are opposed to any presence of Islam on Australian soil. However, there are those who jump on the matter of Islam to hide their actual agenda on immigration.

Even so, Holt let the cat out by saying that there are good Moslems who can “assimilate” and “integrate”. Then, what is his real point? Is it pure cowardice that prevents One Nation from standing behind their words? If multiculturalism is bad, if Islam is a problem, that’s it. Clearly, it is not the coward Holt’s position. Holt said:

"We have welcomed all comers, including the latest surge of immigrants from Islamic countries. However, many Australians are beginning to regret accepting the Islamic influx.  The Muslim people in general are friendly and willing to integrate. Unfortunately, a small section of Islamic hard line radicals are spoiling that image for the majority.”

What is Holt’s gibberish? Essentially Holt welcomes Islamic migration. We are not concerned with “hardline radicals”. We are concerned with all of it.

Australia First Party says that the Australian People have not welcomed “all comers”, nor any “latest surge”.

When challenged that he was a “racist”, Holt told the media: “I am married to a Thai….. How could I be a racist?”

Indeed. There lies a major problem with One Nation.

If Australia First Party had the choice of accepting as members a thousand ‘racists’ or a thousand Mike Holts with their wives from Thailand – we’d take the racists every time. At least they’d have 95% of the story right. The Mike Holts seem to have a bizarre view that some type of sexual assimilation is the vision of the future. If that is so, then one wonders why they don’t join LNP? Mr. Holt is not alone in his special ‘choice’. The One Nation Senate candidate Jim Savage made the same choice.

Peter Schuback said “I question what sort of national identity for Australia is being espoused by this party. I ask where went the ’Australia is being swamped by Asians’ of Hanson’s parliamentary speech of 1996? It seems now each One Nation leader’s bed is a swamp and each has its Asian wife. Strange. I know what Rudyard Kipling said about certain true love matches on the way to Mandalay - but I don’t think One Nation fits the bill.”

Mr. Holt said: "We do believe in immigration and integration. If immigrants can't come here, fit in and become Australian citizens, we don't want them here.”

Which immigrants? European ones? Middle Eastern ones? Asian ones? Does One Nation advocate some sort of universal racial fusion program? If One Nation believes in immigration, can their commitment to any sort of restrictive program be accepted? Australia First asks One Nation to specify. What do you mean? In fact, we believe we know exactly what they mean. Yet, getting them to say it, other than in coded terms is very hard. Can they now just spell it out? It is an important question going to the heart of the debate on immigration, multiculturalism. One Nation tries to avoid our questions, but we are hard on their trail.

Many Australia First members were members of One Nation. They won’t be returning. Something changed in Hanson and in One Nation.

Australia now has a real nationalist party. People looking for the genuine article need look no further.

In the forthcoming election, there will be no Australia First Party ‘preferences’ for One Nation, just harsh criticism. Their game is over.

http://www.echonews.com.au/news/one-nation-candidate-linked-islam-sticker-terroris/1958615/

Petition to Stop Canberra's Latest Money Grab

Australia First Senate candidate Peter Schuback is currently circulating a petition against the plan to introduce GST on fresh fruit and vegetables.

We need to send a loud and clear message to Canberra against this plan which would only hurt struggling Aussie families at a time when most are doing it very tough.

To add your voice to the chorus of opposition, download the petition, print and sign (get as many others to sign as you can too) and when you're done, whether the page is full or not, post to the address indicated.

To download, right-click on: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/22768492/PetitionAustraliaFirst.pdf and select 'save link as' or similar (depending on your browser).

Australia First for the Queensland Senate

Australia First Party has proudly secured an ‘above the line’ ticket for the Queensland Senate in the 2013 Federal Election.
Our Senate Ticket is led by Mr. Peter Schuback, 66, a veteran leader of the proud truck drivers’ struggle and a long time member of the Australian Long Distance Owners’ and Drivers’ Association.

Peter Schuback

Vote One:  Queensland Senate

Proud Queenslander born and bred, Pete Schuback, invites all truck drivers across Queensland to join Australia First’s cause in solidarity for ordinary Queenslanders struggling to keep their homes and families.
We challenge Campbell Newman and his rich party’s taxing and unfair persecution of struggling Queensland truckies and to take a stand against Newman’s austerity regulations.  Rich, big ego Newman is imposing massive new truckie fines only for his own undemocratic revenue raising.
But Pete Schuback is taking a personal stand against Newman on this.
Schuback has political experience and clout, being a local government candidate for Australia First, polling 20% in Hervey Bay last year.  Schuback made his debut as an Australia First Party candidate in 2010 running for the Australian Senate and securing nearly 10,000 on the back of just a truckie’s income.
Schuback, pissed off with government in Brisbane, directed a letter of outrage to a number of Queensland local and regional papers where it was published several times (mentioning his status with the party and his candidature), quote:

“Over the years we have had politicians who have promised us the world and gave us more in taxes.”

Peter Schuback’s Senate Campaign:

“Our country has had its manufacturing industries decimated,  our farming industries have been  just about destroyed.

We as a nation have given away billions of dollars in overseas aid, whilst our own people have gone without (our disabled , our homeless , our mentally ill  and our pensioners have all been treated worse than second class and this has to stop.

We need to change the way our politicians think and we need a new set of fresh faces in politics; fresh thinkers who will work for Australia and Australians FIRST.

We need to take a fresh look at our tax system and make it so everyone that makes a dollar in Australia pays a fair amount of tax and that every dollar is taxed.

We need to look at crime and the ways to prevent it. We need to look at how the courts dish out penalties.  We need to set down a system of rules that the courts follow when giving out sentences so people know that if they steal from you and are caught they will do a minimum amount of time in a prison.

We need to also put persons that are sentenced to prison terms into programs that will give them the chance to learn (Apprenticeships whilst in prison). Give these people the
knowledge and ability to be able to have trades that will allow them to contribute to society in a positive way.

• We need to insure that Australians are looked after first and foremost and that our people come first on the world stage; we as a country cannot afford to give away our wealth
• We must put our people first as far as social services are concerned.
• We need to protect our natural resources for the future. (Once they are gone they are gone)
• We need to value add to our natural resources.
• We need to look after our primary industries so that we as Australians can feed the world.
• We need to put the brakes on immigration and stop the possible over population of Australia.
• We need to protect our fishing industries and we need to insure that our fish stocks will be able to feed our people 100 years into the future.”

So when you look at voting in the next elections look to people that will take on board some or all of these suggestions to protect Australia and Australians first and foremost.
The party has nominated Peter Watson, 21, as number two man on the ticket. Peter was born in Charleville in 1992 and moved to Warwick 1994. Initially, in a Labor family, Peter
was interested in following its principles and when the Warwick ALP branch was formed in 2008, he was elected Vice President.
In 2011, he was elected Branch Secretary. It was Peter’s connection to Labor that caused a scandal for ‘Captain’ Bligh in the 2012 State election when he was endorsed by the
Labor Party as the Southern Downs candidate at the 2012 State Election.
He was dis-endorsed early in the election period after he spoke out against Labor’s anti working class position on privatisation, industrial relations, immigration and other social
issues, Indeed, the nationalists in Australia First counted on Peter being the official Labor candidate after the close of nominations when it was calculated he would be inevitably dis-endorsed, thus allowing him to campaign in a way that reflected what the original Labor Party was about.
Peter was expelled from the ALP and joined Australia First Party after the State Election.

Mr Peter Watson

Australia First’s number 2 for the Queensland Senate

The Australia First Party campaign is designed to raise the profile of the party and recruit new members. It is our intention to supplant the reactionary One Nation party as the
patriotic party in Queensland politics (the position this party has long abandoned) and begin the process of sliding the working class and farmer groups aligned to Katter’s Australian Party towards Australia First after the poll.
A campaign has been designed and is already under way.
Australia First Party calls all patriotic people to donate whatever they can to Australia First’s campaign for Australia’s 2013 Federal Election: all donations from $2 to $1500 are tax deductible.
Australia First Party calls for funding:

ACCOUNT  NAME:   Australia First Party (Queensland)

BANK:                           Westpac Bank

BRANCH:                    BSB 034 660

ACCOUNT No.           281704

Katter...enough is enough...!!!!!

Bob Katter is part of the longstanding mainstream political elite who have stuffed this country completely. He sat on the cross benches as an independent for several decades decrying political parties as the spawn of the devil ... then as a swansong, on the brink of retirement and a massive golden handshake as an independent, he creates ... wait for it ... a ... Political Party. A bit late in any political career to start getting good ideas, especially when he has been in the parliament as long as he has just warming a seat. His actions are designed to split the nationalist vote and to scuttle the vote that would go a real Australian Nationalist party such as Australia First and to render their vote ineffective so the Libs/Nats can win without a substantial portion of the vote going to a smaller emerging party (other than one that is under the control of the old elite). This ensures that the big boys don't have to recognise the otherwise successful emerging parties and can ignore them and their supporters as "electorally irrelevant". Australia First has been engaged in a real political struggle piecing together a party with a real Nationalist agenda for the real Australian people ... along come people like Katter and they get the immediate support of the media (which is continually denied us) and the support of the gullible public, who, if they support Katter and Co will, end up as disillusioned as previous One Nation supporters are today, when the wheels finally fall of the Katter party. Katter himself will retire soon, and I am always very, very suspect of anyone who would have the ego large enough to name a political party after himself (his son as well). Katter is not fair dinkum ... he wants to "populate" northern Australia ... can we ask where the people to do this will come from ... Asia, I am sure. He also wants to give 25% of Australia over to Aborigines. A good gesture I am sure, but it's not his to give and splitting Australia is not Uniting Australia. Katter is a clever plant by the old guard political elite to ensure that real Nationalist Parties don't get too successful. We need to see right through him. Be careful, as Clive Palmer is probably waiting in the wings to do the much the same thing.

Letter: Two Children Dead

Dear Editor

Quite a ruckus has been stirred up over the latest civilian killings in Afghanistan. Australian troops have been mentioned as possibly being involved in the incident. There will be the inevitable enquiry as to what happened. But will we be told the truth?

You can’t fight a war without there being causalities. WW2, Korea, and Vietnam saw many 100s of 1000s if not millions of civilians killed. We can all lament war and wish for peace but the only solution to Australian troops being involved in these incidents is to bring the troops home at once, and let the Afghanistan national government run their own war.

Australia is planning to disengage from the war by 2014 and obviously Aussie troops aren’t too keen on being a causality of this no- win-war, and if they shoot first and ask questions later; who can blame them.

Unfortunately, there will be other wars and more civilian AND military deaths. Until nation states revamp their foreign policies these incidents will continue to happen.

Jay Nauss,

Glen Aplin Qld.

Vale: Nick Maine

Your humble scribe only met Nick once, at the very last Inverell Forum.

But, like everyone in the nationalist scene, yours truly was regularly in receipt of Nick's news, information, rants, solicitations and, perhaps most importantly, his incisive, inciteful and occasionally obscene observations on "life, the universe, and everything".

Anyone with half a brain (and I'm sure Nick suspected that was all any of us had) knew that he was on borrowed time.  Indeed, he had been on borrowed time for many years.

Now, he is gone.

This author didn't know him well enough to call him a friend.  But Nick Maine was a true friend to all nationalists.  Many he never met, and many he never knew existed -- but we all knew him.

The emails were relentless, as were the continual calls to action and the ever-present sub-text: what the bloody hell are you lot doing about it?

Goodbye, Nick.

We will give the bastards hell, just like you told us to.

A Reply to Che Guevara

by Paul Rackemann: reflections on Che Guevara's pamphlet on the development of cadres, reprinted by the Sons of Kokoda, and distributed by the Australia First Party.

     One must remember that military men are in some respects different from men of peace, and the relationships within a Communist organisation are in some respects different from the relationships between free members of a voluntary organisation in a society that is not actually in the throes of armed conflict.
     Comrade Guevara appears to be looking down on his revolutionary group from above. He also assumes responsibility for an entire aspect of society that we can leave alone, i.e. economic production.
     As long as we allow the existence of a stable money system and do not interfere unnecessarily in the affairs of commercial firms, we can confidently expect them to provide for the economic wants of our community. That is one enormous group of cadres we shall not have to train.
     He blathers on about "errors" which are only to be expected when a bunch of soldiers, ignorant of the principles of economics, and equally ignorant of the particular technical knowledge of every industry which can only be known by those actively engaged in it, blithely take command and start issuing orders. He is also, of course, worried about the inevitable development of a class of officers or officials who, having acquired power and some degree of expertise, begin to settle into their positions and make themselves comfortable.
     From what I can recall, Trotsky blathered on about these sorts of "errors" as well.
     Che's romantic ideas about the development of cadres, in special schools mind you, fall down because he and his professors are all working from mistaken assumptions. He shows a childlike belief in the great modern god, Education, which will fail like all the other gods, because it focusses on doctrine and tries to fight reality.
     We as nationalists are not fighting the better aspect of human nature. We are certainly fighting the craven compulsion to conform to the corrupt doctrines of a treacherous ruling elite. We are not fighting the economic instincts of man, which lead to self-interested economic efforts and the existence of a range of large and small economic units specialising in various parts of the productive process. We may be fighting the political power of large economic units, which seek to create a homogenous, non-white market which they can exploit. We are certainly fighting the enormous industry of deception, which calls itself education and the media, and which ties large numbers of rather silly and dishonest people to a depraved doctrine, which they must pass on to get their wages.
     We may need to "develop cadres," as Che says, but we don't need to do it in the way he envisages. We mostly need to develop people with an immunity to the corrupt doctrines of the Establishment, an ability to think without being frightened by the programming so thoroughly inculcated by the scum in authority. We don't need to create superhumans, as Che thinks he does: we simply need to create free minds. Minds that are free will not willingly co-operate in their own destruction by the relatives of man.

Merry Christmas

Thank you all for your support and interest over the past year.  To every one of our readers, supporters and fellow nationalists in general, we wish you all a very merry Christmas, a safe holiday and a happy, healthy and productive 2013.  Let us all hope that this coming new year brings us closer to our goals and that, through our efforts, it will be a year that sees the continued growth of the nationalist message and further victories for our Party and our movement.

Book Review: Cannibal Capitalism

“Cannibal Capitalism”

By Michael C. Hill.

They used to say that people who used a lot of fancy words to say very little had “swallowed a dictionary.” Michael C. Hill seems to have swallowed the “Wall Street Journal.”

Michael C. Hill is, he tells us, the son of a bona fide rocket scientist, who worked at NASA on the space program. After sacrificing his marriage to his career, the elder Hill was put out of a job by the contraction of space exploration after the big excitement of the moon landings. Young Michael, like a lot of us, was determined not to repeat Dad’s mistakes.

He became a capitalist just in time to lose all his money in the Great Financial Crisis of 2008. Now he has written a book called “Cannibal Capitalism” to explain to us where we all went wrong.

There is not a word in the book that I have found to indicate that he is a Negro, but this is coyly revealed by a photograph on the inside back of the dust cover – the book is a hardback.

Michael apparently doesn’t know anything about what is called “fiat money” and the history of corrupt economics – they wouldn’t tell him that at college. He thinks he knows about “capitalism,” and having played the game according to the rules he was taught in college and lost, he has decided, of course, that the rules should be changed. Nobody told him that the rules had been changed way back in the year 1914, and that is when corruption entered the system.

Without going into the details of economic theory, it is certainly possible to argue that all the corrupt banking practices and laws that have been introduced since 1914 amount to an attempt by immensely wealthy families to hold onto their power. One can suspect the Windsors, the Rockefellers, the Rothschilds, and the rest of them of having a hand in the unscrupulous banking laws and the bogus socialist political rhetoric which have helped to preserve the power of these ruling families by freezing people into the class into which they were born.

But Michael C. Hill has apparently never heard of any of this. He thinks the system is a machine that needs tinkering with, and having been to “college” and read all the manuals, he thinks he is just the boy to do the tinkering. He has managed to get a book on the shelves along with Nouriel Roubini and all the other supposed intellectuals who are busy explaining to us how they can tinker with the system better than the next tinkerer. One might almost think they were a bunch of out-of-work mechanics.

In our system, we are supposed to have freedom of speech and publication, so it isn’t always possible to keep people from speaking or writing truth. What you can do, if you are a corrupt Establishment, is to make sure that the words of truth are drowned in an ocean of falsehoods. That is the real function of books like this one by Michael C. Hill, the good Negro, son of another good Negro, both of whom played by whitey’s rules and lost.

Movie Review: Inside Job

Inside Job is a documentary movie dealing with the Subprime Crisis and the following Global Financial Crisis. This movie was produced written and directed by Charles Ferguson with Sony Pictures 2011 and is narrated by Matt Damon.

Running for approximately 2 hours, Inside Job begins with a short examination of financial and political events in Iceland prior to the meltdown. It continues with a thorough examination of what occurred in especially the USA leading on to the eventual 2008 GFC ( Global Financial Crisis ).

The beauty of Inside Job is in its simplicity. It is not a movie exclusively for those well versed in finance and economics, it is presented at a level that most people, irrespective of their station in life will easily understand. The methods used build from one stage to the next and provided the viewer remains alert ( you can always replay individual scenes ) the rewards of new knowledge are without bounds.

Inside Job examines, the banks, the insurance companies, the financial trade, the stock exchanges, the politicians, the academics and the regulators and from this writers point of view at least, finds them all wanting. Inside Job digs up the real issues and puts the hard questions to the right people, some of whom are very noticeable by their unavailability to answer questions and some by the way in which they responded to fair questions. Get the story on what really happened.

The final message of Inside Job is a concerning one. It proposes that despite the promises of politicians, especially the US President, necessary change is not apparent and it infers that the whole exercise could be repeated.

If you don’t think that you could possibly understand the details of the financial and banking world, think again. Get a hold of Inside Job and treat yourself to some raw information that exposes the decision makers and the benefactors. You won’t regret it. Highly Recommended.

Almost Compulsory Viewing.

Inside Job can be rented from most Video outlets and it is available for purchase online.

David Penberthy and his smears – the Greens, the September 11 truthers and me

Dr. Jim Saleam


Editor's note: the following item was received a few weeks ago and is still entirely relevant.  It is published as received, however readers need to take into account references therein to the timing of the events described which are relative to the time the article was written and not to the date of publication.  The delay in publication is entirely the fault of your humble editor!

David Penberthy, scribbler at the Courier-Mail and Sunday Mail has over the last couple of weeks taken my name in vain in a newspapers’ war against the NSW Greens Senator, Lee Rhiannon.

The story was that Senator Rhiannon met with Mr. John Bursill, a man who questions the official story and seeks ‘the truth’ about the September 2001 Twin Towers attacks in New York. It was then said that I had previously invited Mr. Bursill to address the Sydney Forum (variously described as a creation of the Australia First Party and an assembly of ‘far right activists’). It was then the smear that there is some ‘link’ between myself and Senator Rhiannon and she fails some credibility test via a ‘link’ with me. I could also say I might fail a credibility test via a link with her.

I note this horse manure has appeared also in The Australian newspaper over the last two weeks also. Why it should be that the papers have launched a broadside at Rhiannon I cannot say, but the truth around David Penberthy smells.

On September 23 the following appeared under Penberthy’s pen:

Lee Rhiannon: She can’t handle the truth(ers)

“Despite her left-wing convictions, Rhiannon went ahead and held a meeting with Bursill at the same time he had given an address to another meeting of right-wing extremists to push his truther views. The meeting was called the Sydney Forum and was a gathering of Far Right activists organised by a lapsed Nazi called Jim Saleam, the former head of the cheerily named National Socialist Party. “

Lovely. Unfortunately for Penberthy, I have never been the “former head” of the “cheerily named” National Socialist Party, a group which did exist in Australia, but which disappeared in 1975. I have observed that other journalists have insisted since that it does exist, but other than citing a few ex-agents of the discredited one-time Special Branch police making such claims, no evidence has really been produced. Of course, the journalists at issue knew whom they were quoting, which raises serious questions, all made worse because it has sometimes been me who has told them of this fact – but let us not stray too far from peeling back Penberthy’s falsity. Raising too many points about why journalists simply lie would be a book.

Penberthy’s bile prompted Senator Rhiannon to write in the Sunday Mail (September 30)

Greens senator says column incorrect:

David Penberthy (SM, September 23) made a serious mistake when he claimed that I attended and spoke at "a gathering of Far Right activists organised by a lapsed Nazi called Jim Saleam, the former head of the cheerily named National Socialist Party." This is false.

I have acknowledged I met with "truther", John Bursill. The Australian newspaper asserted that this person may have attended a meeting of the Sydney Forum. To then conclude that I attended this event or was associated with it is ludicrous.
- Lee Rhiannon, Australian Greens Senator for NSW

I have clashed with Penberthy before when he was editor at the Sydney Daily Telegraph, after I was smeared by a gutless ‘anti racist’ called Joe Hildebrand. I lost two cases against Hildebrand at the Press Council and won another, prompting Penberthy to berate me for taking cases there anyway. Of course, at the Press Council, wins and losses don’t mean too much as ‘truth’ ain’t really the issue there. Nonetheless, complaints can serve a useful purpose, although the best defence against journalist liars is never to talk to them at all.

But the hot story about this smear-monger goes back in time to Adelaide University in the 1980’s. Back then, Penberthy was a Trotskyite communist, a position from which he lapsed (sic) in the pursuit of the status and money a mainstream job surely holds. The story goes that either Penberthy personally, but certainly his closest friends, challenged violently two members of the nationalist organisation, Nation Action, which I then co-directed. Sadly, the Trotskyite gang picked the wrong two blokes and their defence against assault left bloodied noses and bruises.

Do I detect the smell of a journalist’s revenge? Is it that Penberthy can never resist a chance to tell some tall tale about me?

As nationalist politics develops in Queensland under the auspices of the Australia first Party, I have little doubt that David Penberthy will be there, his computer keyboard burning with his own ‘truth’ and his pen dripped in toilet water.

Property Rights

Your reporter recently (29th-30th June 2012) attended the annual meeting, in Rockhampton Queensland this year, of Property Rights Australia, a group of which he has been a very ordinary member for a number of years, usually without attending anything.

Young nationalists may wonder what a property rights group has to do with the interests of nationalists. This is one of those matters that aren’t what they appear to be, to a casual glance. Secure property rights are one of the things that make the difference between a civilised country and an uncivilised one.

Without going into a lot of romantic stuff about our Christian heritage and the gradual development of “law and order” and the protection of the individual down through the centuries, it is still true, generally speaking, that our rellies in Europe and North America have secure property rights, and the dwellers in the uncivilised world do not.

In the uncivilised world, generally speaking, individuals do not have property: they are property. Their superiors own them. This is of course also the position of, for example, soldiers, even in the civilised world.

The first property right for the individual is the right not to be the property of someone more important, or of a group or commune. Communists disregard property rights, and even their highest leaders, once fallen from grace, have no practical rights against collective decisions. Lenin himself was strictly supervised, told what he could and could not write, in his last days.

The existence of people with secure property rights is a great hindrance to power-hungry governments. They do everything they can to whittle property rights away.

At present the stress point for property rights is the “global warming” story concocted by the environmentalists. It is claimed that the deadly danger of global warming makes it necessary for governments to override property rights. This drives people who own real property (land) wild: they never know what rights are going to be taken away next.

One of the differences between Communists and Fascists is that Communists seize property, but Fascists tell you it is still yours and you are still responsible for it, but they will tell you what you can and can’t do with it, often in considerable detail. Our democratic governments today are very much fascist governments. They have even taken over the family, telling parents increasingly what they can and cannot do with their children, while still holding the parents responsible if the children go wrong.

That is the great joke of the twentieth century: Mussolini and Hitler were denounced as evil men, and their armies were defeated, but the principles they had in common were increasingly adopted by their erstwhile enemies.

Today, we in Australia are the property of the worldwide collective. The plan is apparently to breed us out of existence, in favour of other races who for one reason or another enjoy the favour of the higher groups (pseudo-intellectuals and sentimentalists) who own us. (We might recall the replacement of Hereford cattle by Zebus forty years ago as an analogy.) We do not have property: we are property, and we are junk property at that. Our owners are planning to switch brands.

The Olympic ideal doesn't extend to freedom of thought

In a move that reveals the true nature of political oppression in the world today, the German Olympic Committee is to send German rower Nadja Drygalla home because it is alleged that her boyfriend is an official in the German political party NPD (National Democrats) -- a party considered by its opponents to be "neo-Nazi".

Read the full report here:
http://www.smh.com.au/olympics/off-the-field/german-rower-sent-home-due-to-neonazi-links-20120803-23lbd.html#ixzz22Uo8gkIV

We draw readers' attention to the following statement from German Olympic Committee official Michael Vesper: "If she confirms that she has nothing to do with (the far-right), why shouldn't she continue (to compete for Germany)?"

Attentive readers will notice that implicit in this statement is the simple fact that if she does in fact have any involvement personally in the "far-right", then her career is over.  This should surprise no-one.  The SMH article also mentions that her relationship was the reason for her resignation from the German police.  We might conclude that the resignation was not entirely a matter of choice, but the article does not specify.

Michael Vesper, incidentally, was until 2006 a German politician representing the far-left party Alliance 90/The Greens.

An announcement regarding the Australia First email account

It has been brought to the attention of Australia First organisers that the official email contact for the Queensland Branch of the Party (afpqld@hotmail.com) is no longer being maintained.  Unfortunately, this has led to the suspension of the account in question.  This matter has been rectified, however a consequence of the suspension is that any emails received before the suspension occurred have been lost and cannot be recovered.

We understand that this is frustrating to all concerned, but request that anyone who has raised any important matters with us at this email address please re-send your email.  We guarantee that it will be answered promptly.  It is our firm resolve to put this unfortunate incident behind us by ensuring an efficient and businesslike service to all enquirers and supporters from this time forward.

Jeremy Lee: Vale

Somewhat belatedly, Australia First Party would mention the sad passing, some eight weeks ago, of Jeremy Lee.

Mr. Lee was an earnest speaker, writer and campaigner on many issues of concern to patriotic Australians.

Jeremy Lee lived his early life in Kenya before moving to Australia in the 1960’s, where he became active with the Australian League Of Rights. In that capacity for over 20 years, he toured Australia as an inspirational speaker. After moving away from the League in the 1990’s, he continued in his general role and was a great supporter of the Inverell Forum.

In the last 15 years, it was not uncommon for videos and DVD’s from his remarkable tape-library to turn up in workplaces across the country on subjects such as the banking credit creation fraud, the New World Order and our rights and freedoms which have been under sustained attack.

In the last few years, Jeremy Lee was unwell and confined to care. His last political visitor was Perry Jewell. This old fighter will be missed by all who believe in winning Australian independence from the globalist forces. Vale: Jeremy Lee.

Thoughts on the recent French Presidential Election

The following was sent in by an Australia First member and reader of this blog, regarding the French elections.  Although written before the final result was known, the writer has got it 'spot on' and the comments he has made are just as valid now with the benefit of hindsight as they were when he made them.  Despite being received too late to publish as an election preview, we publish this item now -- unaltered -- on its own merits.  Of course readers must allow for the use of the future tense in describing what is now a past event.

Establishment Watch:

The French Elections.

At the time of writing, the French presidential elections are not complete.

In France, the election of a President of the Republic is potentially, and often in actuality, a two-stage process. A round of voting takes place in which all duly nominated candidates are eligible. This may result in a majority of votes for one candidate, in which case he is declared elected. If not, a second round of voting takes place in which the voters must choose between the two candidates who placed first and second in the first round.

This resembles the “preferential” system of voting used in many Australian elections, except that it is cruder, and easier for voters to understand.

The present French elections have caused some concern to degenerates around the world: the evil, “extreme right” party, the Front Nationale, did better than expected, with 18-20% of the vote (the story to hand doesn’t put it more precisely than that).

As we all know, nice people do not vote for “far-right” parties. Voting for plain “right” parties is not very nice either, but when the “far right” comes into the picture, the “right” suddenly becomes halfway respectable.

The “Australian Financial Review,” Australian business’s newspaper of record, published on 24th April 2012 an opinion piece which, in the absence of anything else on the subject, may be taken as the newspaper’s own opinion on French politics.

The story describes the good result for the Front Nationale as unprecedented, which it isn’t: one or two elections ago, the Front Nationale candidate came in second, knocking the Socialist candidate out of the race, and forcing French leftist leaders to beg their followers to turn out and vote for the Conservative candidate, for fear (alors!) that the extra-evil candidate might win. This time, the Socialists actually came first, assuring them of a place in the second round.

That potentially leaves it up to the evil right-wing voters to choose between the two leading candidates, and on the usual (fictional) political spectrum, this means that the Conservative candidate should win comfortably. But French voters know more about French politics than Australian journalists do, and apparently the (sitting Conservative) President has such a reputation as a rat and a sycophant to Arab immigrants that the Front Nationale voters are unlikely to be able to bring themselves to vote for him.

So the Socialist candidate seems likely to win.

What Establishment politicians do is often unpredictable: politicians who claim to be conservative sometimes run spendthrift, race-mixing administrations, while leftist politicians have been known (on rare occasions) to clean things up. So it isn’t clear that honest (“evil right-wing”) voters have a dog in this race, or which dog it may be.

What may be more interesting is that the “Fin. Review” claims that the Front Nationale has abandoned free-market economics. According to the “Fin. Review,” whose readers generally speaking have a big stake in the continuation of some degree of free-market policy, the evil rightists are now making common cause with the Reds on this issue. Over one-third of French voters, the paper says, now vote for anti-market parties. Notice that this counts the French Socialists, like the Labor Party in Australia, as a business party.

Peter Schuback scores a fine result in council elections

With a total of over 1000 votes and standing at 19.11% of vote, Peter Schuback has "done us proud" in representing the voice of ordinary Australia and the Australia First Party in Division 8 for the Fraser Coast Regional Council (Hervey Bay).

Results such as this put the corrupt parties of the establishment on notice that we have all had enough and want real change, not just a revolving door of career politicians and ex-bureaucrats.

But the story doesn't end here.  There were apparently some serious issues with the conduct of the ballot and a challenge to the result is in order.

Peter Schuback explains:
"In the Fraser Coast region some divisional polling booths ran out of ballot papers. This means that some people did not vote and in this case this should make the elections invalid. I am now calling on the EQC to declare the council election of 2012 invalid and for the ECQ to recall the elections at no cost to the candidates."

Well done, Peter -- and keep fighting!