Your reporter recently (29th-30th June 2012) attended the annual meeting, in Rockhampton Queensland this year, of Property Rights Australia, a group of which he has been a very ordinary member for a number of years, usually without attending anything.
Young nationalists may wonder what a property rights group has to do with the interests of nationalists. This is one of those matters that aren’t what they appear to be, to a casual glance. Secure property rights are one of the things that make the difference between a civilised country and an uncivilised one.
Without going into a lot of romantic stuff about our Christian heritage and the gradual development of “law and order” and the protection of the individual down through the centuries, it is still true, generally speaking, that our rellies in Europe and North America have secure property rights, and the dwellers in the uncivilised world do not.
In the uncivilised world, generally speaking, individuals do not have property: they are property. Their superiors own them. This is of course also the position of, for example, soldiers, even in the civilised world.
The first property right for the individual is the right not to be the property of someone more important, or of a group or commune. Communists disregard property rights, and even their highest leaders, once fallen from grace, have no practical rights against collective decisions. Lenin himself was strictly supervised, told what he could and could not write, in his last days.
The existence of people with secure property rights is a great hindrance to power-hungry governments. They do everything they can to whittle property rights away.
At present the stress point for property rights is the “global warming” story concocted by the environmentalists. It is claimed that the deadly danger of global warming makes it necessary for governments to override property rights. This drives people who own real property (land) wild: they never know what rights are going to be taken away next.
One of the differences between Communists and Fascists is that Communists seize property, but Fascists tell you it is still yours and you are still responsible for it, but they will tell you what you can and can’t do with it, often in considerable detail. Our democratic governments today are very much fascist governments. They have even taken over the family, telling parents increasingly what they can and cannot do with their children, while still holding the parents responsible if the children go wrong.
That is the great joke of the twentieth century: Mussolini and Hitler were denounced as evil men, and their armies were defeated, but the principles they had in common were increasingly adopted by their erstwhile enemies.
Today, we in Australia are the property of the worldwide collective. The plan is apparently to breed us out of existence, in favour of other races who for one reason or another enjoy the favour of the higher groups (pseudo-intellectuals and sentimentalists) who own us. (We might recall the replacement of Hereford cattle by Zebus forty years ago as an analogy.) We do not have property: we are property, and we are junk property at that. Our owners are planning to switch brands.
14 August 2012
05 August 2012
The Olympic ideal doesn't extend to freedom of thought
In a move that reveals the true nature of political oppression in the world today, the German Olympic Committee is to send German rower Nadja Drygalla home because it is alleged that her boyfriend is an official in the German political party NPD (National Democrats) -- a party considered by its opponents to be "neo-Nazi".
Read the full report here:
http://www.smh.com.au/olympics/off-the-field/german-rower-sent-home-due-to-neonazi-links-20120803-23lbd.html#ixzz22Uo8gkIV
We draw readers' attention to the following statement from German Olympic Committee official Michael Vesper: "If she confirms that she has nothing to do with (the far-right), why shouldn't she continue (to compete for Germany)?"
Attentive readers will notice that implicit in this statement is the simple fact that if she does in fact have any involvement personally in the "far-right", then her career is over. This should surprise no-one. The SMH article also mentions that her relationship was the reason for her resignation from the German police. We might conclude that the resignation was not entirely a matter of choice, but the article does not specify.
Michael Vesper, incidentally, was until 2006 a German politician representing the far-left party Alliance 90/The Greens.
Read the full report here:
http://www.smh.com.au/olympics/off-the-field/german-rower-sent-home-due-to-neonazi-links-20120803-23lbd.html#ixzz22Uo8gkIV
We draw readers' attention to the following statement from German Olympic Committee official Michael Vesper: "If she confirms that she has nothing to do with (the far-right), why shouldn't she continue (to compete for Germany)?"
Attentive readers will notice that implicit in this statement is the simple fact that if she does in fact have any involvement personally in the "far-right", then her career is over. This should surprise no-one. The SMH article also mentions that her relationship was the reason for her resignation from the German police. We might conclude that the resignation was not entirely a matter of choice, but the article does not specify.
Michael Vesper, incidentally, was until 2006 a German politician representing the far-left party Alliance 90/The Greens.
01 August 2012
An announcement regarding the Australia First email account
It has been brought to the attention of Australia First organisers that the official email contact for the Queensland Branch of the Party (afpqld@hotmail.com) is no longer being maintained. Unfortunately, this has led to the suspension of the account in question. This matter has been rectified, however a consequence of the suspension is that any emails received before the suspension occurred have been lost and cannot be recovered.
We understand that this is frustrating to all concerned, but request that anyone who has raised any important matters with us at this email address please re-send your email. We guarantee that it will be answered promptly. It is our firm resolve to put this unfortunate incident behind us by ensuring an efficient and businesslike service to all enquirers and supporters from this time forward.
We understand that this is frustrating to all concerned, but request that anyone who has raised any important matters with us at this email address please re-send your email. We guarantee that it will be answered promptly. It is our firm resolve to put this unfortunate incident behind us by ensuring an efficient and businesslike service to all enquirers and supporters from this time forward.
09 June 2012
Jeremy Lee: Vale
Somewhat belatedly, Australia First Party would mention the sad passing, some eight weeks ago, of Jeremy Lee.
Mr. Lee was an earnest speaker, writer and campaigner on many issues of concern to patriotic Australians.
Jeremy Lee lived his early life in Kenya before moving to Australia in the 1960’s, where he became active with the Australian League Of Rights. In that capacity for over 20 years, he toured Australia as an inspirational speaker. After moving away from the League in the 1990’s, he continued in his general role and was a great supporter of the Inverell Forum.
In the last 15 years, it was not uncommon for videos and DVD’s from his remarkable tape-library to turn up in workplaces across the country on subjects such as the banking credit creation fraud, the New World Order and our rights and freedoms which have been under sustained attack.
In the last few years, Jeremy Lee was unwell and confined to care. His last political visitor was Perry Jewell. This old fighter will be missed by all who believe in winning Australian independence from the globalist forces. Vale: Jeremy Lee.
24 May 2012
Thoughts on the recent French Presidential Election
The following was sent in by an Australia First member and reader of this blog, regarding the French elections. Although written before the final result was known, the writer has got it 'spot on' and the comments he has made are just as valid now with the benefit of hindsight as they were when he made them. Despite being received too late to publish as an election preview, we publish this item now -- unaltered -- on its own merits. Of course readers must allow for the use of the future tense in describing what is now a past event.
In France, the election of a President of the Republic is potentially, and often in actuality, a two-stage process. A round of voting takes place in which all duly nominated candidates are eligible. This may result in a majority of votes for one candidate, in which case he is declared elected. If not, a second round of voting takes place in which the voters must choose between the two candidates who placed first and second in the first round.
This resembles the “preferential” system of voting used in many Australian elections, except that it is cruder, and easier for voters to understand.
The present French elections have caused some concern to degenerates around the world: the evil, “extreme right” party, the Front Nationale, did better than expected, with 18-20% of the vote (the story to hand doesn’t put it more precisely than that).
As we all know, nice people do not vote for “far-right” parties. Voting for plain “right” parties is not very nice either, but when the “far right” comes into the picture, the “right” suddenly becomes halfway respectable.
The “Australian Financial Review,” Australian business’s newspaper of record, published on 24th April 2012 an opinion piece which, in the absence of anything else on the subject, may be taken as the newspaper’s own opinion on French politics.
The story describes the good result for the Front Nationale as unprecedented, which it isn’t: one or two elections ago, the Front Nationale candidate came in second, knocking the Socialist candidate out of the race, and forcing French leftist leaders to beg their followers to turn out and vote for the Conservative candidate, for fear (alors!) that the extra-evil candidate might win. This time, the Socialists actually came first, assuring them of a place in the second round.
That potentially leaves it up to the evil right-wing voters to choose between the two leading candidates, and on the usual (fictional) political spectrum, this means that the Conservative candidate should win comfortably. But French voters know more about French politics than Australian journalists do, and apparently the (sitting Conservative) President has such a reputation as a rat and a sycophant to Arab immigrants that the Front Nationale voters are unlikely to be able to bring themselves to vote for him.
So the Socialist candidate seems likely to win.
What Establishment politicians do is often unpredictable: politicians who claim to be conservative sometimes run spendthrift, race-mixing administrations, while leftist politicians have been known (on rare occasions) to clean things up. So it isn’t clear that honest (“evil right-wing”) voters have a dog in this race, or which dog it may be.
What may be more interesting is that the “Fin. Review” claims that the Front Nationale has abandoned free-market economics. According to the “Fin. Review,” whose readers generally speaking have a big stake in the continuation of some degree of free-market policy, the evil rightists are now making common cause with the Reds on this issue. Over one-third of French voters, the paper says, now vote for anti-market parties. Notice that this counts the French Socialists, like the Labor Party in Australia, as a business party.
Establishment Watch:
The French Elections.
At the time of writing, the French presidential elections are not complete.In France, the election of a President of the Republic is potentially, and often in actuality, a two-stage process. A round of voting takes place in which all duly nominated candidates are eligible. This may result in a majority of votes for one candidate, in which case he is declared elected. If not, a second round of voting takes place in which the voters must choose between the two candidates who placed first and second in the first round.
This resembles the “preferential” system of voting used in many Australian elections, except that it is cruder, and easier for voters to understand.
The present French elections have caused some concern to degenerates around the world: the evil, “extreme right” party, the Front Nationale, did better than expected, with 18-20% of the vote (the story to hand doesn’t put it more precisely than that).
As we all know, nice people do not vote for “far-right” parties. Voting for plain “right” parties is not very nice either, but when the “far right” comes into the picture, the “right” suddenly becomes halfway respectable.
The “Australian Financial Review,” Australian business’s newspaper of record, published on 24th April 2012 an opinion piece which, in the absence of anything else on the subject, may be taken as the newspaper’s own opinion on French politics.
The story describes the good result for the Front Nationale as unprecedented, which it isn’t: one or two elections ago, the Front Nationale candidate came in second, knocking the Socialist candidate out of the race, and forcing French leftist leaders to beg their followers to turn out and vote for the Conservative candidate, for fear (alors!) that the extra-evil candidate might win. This time, the Socialists actually came first, assuring them of a place in the second round.
That potentially leaves it up to the evil right-wing voters to choose between the two leading candidates, and on the usual (fictional) political spectrum, this means that the Conservative candidate should win comfortably. But French voters know more about French politics than Australian journalists do, and apparently the (sitting Conservative) President has such a reputation as a rat and a sycophant to Arab immigrants that the Front Nationale voters are unlikely to be able to bring themselves to vote for him.
So the Socialist candidate seems likely to win.
What Establishment politicians do is often unpredictable: politicians who claim to be conservative sometimes run spendthrift, race-mixing administrations, while leftist politicians have been known (on rare occasions) to clean things up. So it isn’t clear that honest (“evil right-wing”) voters have a dog in this race, or which dog it may be.
What may be more interesting is that the “Fin. Review” claims that the Front Nationale has abandoned free-market economics. According to the “Fin. Review,” whose readers generally speaking have a big stake in the continuation of some degree of free-market policy, the evil rightists are now making common cause with the Reds on this issue. Over one-third of French voters, the paper says, now vote for anti-market parties. Notice that this counts the French Socialists, like the Labor Party in Australia, as a business party.
10 May 2012
Peter Schuback scores a fine result in council elections
With a total of over 1000 votes and standing at 19.11% of vote, Peter Schuback has "done us proud" in representing the voice of ordinary Australia and the Australia First Party in Division 8 for the Fraser Coast Regional Council (Hervey Bay).
Results such as this put the corrupt parties of the establishment on notice that we have all had enough and want real change, not just a revolving door of career politicians and ex-bureaucrats.
But the story doesn't end here. There were apparently some serious issues with the conduct of the ballot and a challenge to the result is in order.
Peter Schuback explains:
"In the Fraser Coast region some divisional polling booths ran out of ballot papers. This means that some people did not vote and in this case this should make the elections invalid. I am now calling on the EQC to declare the council election of 2012 invalid and for the ECQ to recall the elections at no cost to the candidates."
Well done, Peter -- and keep fighting!
Results such as this put the corrupt parties of the establishment on notice that we have all had enough and want real change, not just a revolving door of career politicians and ex-bureaucrats.
But the story doesn't end here. There were apparently some serious issues with the conduct of the ballot and a challenge to the result is in order.
Peter Schuback explains:
"In the Fraser Coast region some divisional polling booths ran out of ballot papers. This means that some people did not vote and in this case this should make the elections invalid. I am now calling on the EQC to declare the council election of 2012 invalid and for the ECQ to recall the elections at no cost to the candidates."
Well done, Peter -- and keep fighting!
27 April 2012
Peter Schuback: campaign announcement
The following is a campaign
statement on behalf of Peter Schuback, Australia First member and
candidate for Hervey Bay.
Peter Schuback: Achievements
I started the campaign to clean up
Asbestos in Schools.
I put pressure on to the government to
get two major toxic waste dumps cleaned up.
I put government and schools on notice
under duty of care laws to stop bullying in schools.
With the help of the ACCC, I took
Telstra to the high court in Melbourne for false and misleading
advertising.
I took the oil companies on and forced
them to pay compensation to people when their engines and pumps
failed after the oil companies introduced low sulphur diesel without
notifying anyone.
I forced the Federal Government to
honour a contract to supply funds for a main road after promises were
made leading up to an election.
I, along with Ken Hay, forced the State
Government to clean up dumped refugee boats out of the Fitzroy River.
I have issued over 300,000 requests for
a review of an infringement notice forms to people in Australia and
overseas so they can contest unfair fines without going to court.
I exposed the State Government’s
misinformation on Q-fever and made people aware of the problems
caused from this disease.
I have, as the vice-president of the
Australian Long Distance Owners and Drivers Association, lobbied to
get safe rates for truck drivers.
I have put the Government on notice
using their own laws in regards to unsafe roads and they are now
being pursued by persons who have been injured because of dangerous
road conditions.
I am currently fighting to try to stop
the increase in Fire Levies and the down-grading of a number of rural
fire services.
I am currently letting people know
about the failures of ULP (Unleaded petrol) and the damage that
ethanol can and will do to your engines.
I have fought to make people aware of
their rights and to stop governments from introducing unfair and
unworkable laws.
I have for many years worked to make
sure that people get a fair deal and that people are not screwed by
Government departments.
I have achieved many things over and
above what is listed here and I will continue to work to look after
people and our region.
I have achieved more than most of the
other candidates that are running for this council have.
If you want someone that will work and
that has already achieved then give me your vote or if you want a
would-be-if-they-could-be vote for someone else. While they are
talking about it, I get it done.
Ideas and Solutions
We have problems, so I will set out
some of them with the solutions.
Problems: high unemployment, low
occupancy rates for accommodation suppliers, drugs and crime, small
businesses going broke from lack of turn-over, homelessness – high
number of people that are homeless or are couch hopping / sleeping in
cars and in tents some in the bush – and that is just a few of our
local problems.
Solutions to problems: high
unemployment can or could be solved by turning our area into a trade
free zone or enterprise zone, giving businesses an incentive to come
to our region to set up with tax relief.
Problem: low occupancy rate for
accommodation suppliers. Solution: promote our region along with all
other shires in our region in a joint push for tourists. Simple ideas
like distributing 250,000 leaflets promoting our region in other
states.
Problem: drugs and crime. Solution: get courts to sentence
first offenders to either a term in jail or a term learning a trade
so they are given a chance to become a tradie in life. Make them work
and be tired and they won’t have enough time to get stoned or
commit petty crimes.
Problem: small businesses going broke. Solution:
promote our area or region by having our school children become
pen-friends with other children around Australia and the rest of the
world and have them invite those children to our region for holidays.
They spend money and our region prospers. Put up signs up and down
the highways telling people what we have to offer. Send out DVDs of
the attractions in our area to all military bases around the world
inviting the people that view then to come here for R&R. Get a
rep to travel to all major businesses around Australia that employ a
large number of people and show them the DVDs over lunch and give out
promotional material. Steel mills, car manufacturers, paper mills and
many other large volume employers would be targeted.
Problem:
homeless persons. Solution: build low cost accommodation for our
homeless. (Could be Council owned and operated to create an income
for the council and a asset that increases in value.) A 9 metre x 6
metre cottage can cost as little as $30,000 to build. Ok, so they
are not flash, but they are dry and can be built to get people off of
the streets and out of cars. Low-cost accommodation of this sort is
going to become a priority in the coming years as our populations get
older and they can not afford the high costs of the current type of
accommodation.
Ok, so we have a problem with crime in
our area and there are a lot of young people that are getting
themselves into trouble and spoiling their lives and we need to stop
and look at the reasons why. Education is in some way at fault and I
am not blaming the teachers but the system. Some young people are
either academically bright or lean more towards trades. The ones that
lean towards trades should have the ability in school to be taught a
trade say from grade eight and they would be trade-ready and have the
qualifications to be tradespeople when they leave school and would
only have to do one year under a master tradesman while the ones that
are more academically inclined should be taught the skills they need
in that area to follow their dreams. As we all know children develop
at different speeds and some will not be able to be taught trades
whilst still at school and will come out of the education system
still lacking life skills. I believe the solution here is to train
them when they are a little more mature. That's where our retired
tradies come into play. They should, if they wish, become trainers
and to give them the incentives to train people they should be able
to earn up to $40,000 per year tax free. So where is this money
coming from? Well, it costs around $40,000 per year so I have been
informed to keep one young person in a low-security facility. For
every person that we keep out of the jail system and out of trouble
we will be able to employ a trainer. There are many retired people
out there who can and would like to pass on their skills. We are not
going to be able to help every child but for every one we keep away
from drugs and crime, we and our society are the winners and the
young people we help will be able to contribute to our society in a
meaningful way.
Ok, so here are a few ideas to fix some
of our problems. All are low cost and will give value for money.
So
now it’s time for people to stop whinging about our region and its
problems and get off of their butts and do some thing to fix the
problems. GET INVOLVED and work to fix the problems. All of the above
affect us all in one way or another so help to fix the problems.
Peter Schuback
jamfig@hotmail.com.au
0408 458 232
Written and Authorised by Peter
Schuback 191 Condor Drive Hervey bay 4655.
Get involved – join Peter’s
campaign forum:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)