27 May 2010

Liberal Party Seeks Out Its 'Patriotic' Three Stooges

Dr. Jim Saleam

The Liberal Party is up to its old tricks again. With public concern heightened by the refugee invasion and with immigration soaring to unheard of levels, the Liberal Party is floating out its rhetoric of “concern”.

The spin doctors have TV ads that feature maps of refugee boat streams heading towards Australia. Abbott talks of “sustainability” being out of whack in KRudd’s immigration plans. Shadow Immigration Minister Morrison has talked tough about “asylum seekers” being “illegal” and that it’s time to be “tough”.

It is all meant to deceive. It is schemed to win the public to believe that the Liberal Party will do something about it all. It won’t and as before (like with the Tampa ‘children overboard’ affair in 2001), the public will be lulled into colluding with one of the parties of the establishment, while it gets on with the job of dispossessing the Australian people in their own land through the continuation of immigration (and economic globalisation).

But the worst aspect of the deception is not that the public is the victim of a con, it is rather that people who should know better - line up to suckle the Liberal pig.

The Delusion

John Pasquarelli has written an important article. We remember him as an advisor to Pauline Hanson in 1997 and – more recently – as an official of the short-lived Pauline’s United Australia Party. His piece appeared on the website ‘The Australian Conservative’, a Liberal-Party-connected forum and news site.

In this piece, Pasquarelli advised all patriotic people not to found other parties that compete with the Liberals – but to rally together with the Libs, even as a faction of opinion within the party such that they may have a “say” in a mainstream party. In particular, he admonished two micro (Federally unregistered) ‘parties’ – the Protectionists and the Conservative United Party – to get with the program. The alternative was the hard yards of amassing funds and resources which he put in the ‘too hard basket’.

Pasquarelli, for all his intelligence, may have missed the point. In fact, the Liberals don’t mind these outside micro groups at all. If he had looked closer, he would have seen a strong current of common opinion (as we shall describe shortly) and most importantly, a fervent desire on their part to enter the mainstream through the Liberal prism, but in posturing competition against Liberal ‘softness’. The Libs hold out the illusion that they are agreeable in fact and that their voting herds and financiers might see the light in the future and come to these new ‘hard’ conservative parties. They hold out that they are soft because they are compelled to be and that the hard men can bring them back to true Liberal principles if they work hard enough. So, the micro parties work hard at a project (mainstreaming via the scheme to recruit the Liberal herds) that will never eventuate. Pasquarelli should have noted that all this chatter was actually taking place on a Liberal forum! And the Libs are happy about that.

Significantly, e did not mention Australia First in all this and for that we are truly grateful; after all, we are not in the program.

Weird Facts

Consider what’s happening. It looks weird at first glance.

Recently, Pauline Hanson, of all people, appeared on national television to tell us that Abbott would make a better PM than KRudd. What? This was the very same Tony Abbott whose ‘Australians For Honest Politics’ put her in gaol! Now she wants Abbott? But, remember what David Oldfield, her adviser, said years ago: “the aim of the One Nation was to make the Liberal Party more right wing.”

Was Pauline just returning to daddy? In other words, was the original One Nation just a reflection of stress in the Liberal Party heartland which was allowed to fester into a group that fundamentally – the Liberals still had a hook into? When the beat had run its course, it could be safely reintegrated back into the fold?

Now Hanson wants the conservatives not to rebel (that is too dangerous now; like the original One Nation did briefly, it could get out of control). Rather, she recommends they line up pure and simple behind the Liberal Party. What happened to her rhetoric about “Australia is being swamped by Asians?” All gone. Now she is more concerned that her house is not sold to a “Moslem”. Peddling a little ‘anti-Islam’ is not really a challenge to the Asianizing establishment.

And Alan Jones. The man who defended Hanson whilst she was a prisoner may now front for the John Howard Institute, a policy making think tank – for guess who? The nominal president of this group has been touted as one fellow who is big in the David Clarke faction of the New South Wales Liberals. This conservative, David Clarke, had his faction resuscitated by Abbott in 1996 as a barrier to too many Liberals sliding over to Hanson and as a fish-hook to reel them all back in when the time was ripe.

With Hanson as the big endorsement to the Liberals overall and Jones in the wings, Abbott has solid foundations to ensure that there is never a real radicalisation of the conservatives. Getting to this point isn’t weird: it’s diabolically clever.

So: the Three Stooges Get A Role

Of course, the conservatives in the Liberal Party, like the unionists in the ALP and certain farmers in the Nats, are all people who can, under particular circumstances, move away from their traditional alignments. Under temporary stress, some slid over to the former One Nation. They could do something similar again. But if the crisis of globalism becomes deeper (there are signs in the European debt crisis), or if domestic pressures against free trade and mass immigration become stronger, some may opt out of establishment politics altogether.

Enter Australia First.

For the Liberals, that must never happen. So they have their three stooges waiting. They have groups on hand that may even in themselves be genuine structures, but which can be conned into singing the Abbott chorus.

I refer unashamedly to the Australian Conservative United Party, to the Australian Protectionist Party and to One Nation (or at least a faction of it seemingly dominant in New South Wales and strong elsewhere).

What’s the con?

Well, there’s always the anti-Islam routine. The establishment doesn’t mind that – at least to a certain extent. As nationalists have said: this blows off steam while the state builds support for the faked up wars on terror (sic). They let people direct their rage at multiculturalism at the Moslems in Australia, careful always that it not spill over into a generalized critique of immigration generally. But these groups can go that extra mile. They can talk up the need to follow the ‘war on terror’, to support Israeli foreign policy, to bloc with the Zionists within the Australian Jewish community against any deals with the Palestinians and for the coming war with Iran – and so on. They can do the Liberal Party’s foreign policy propaganda work for them. When one goes down the militant anti Islam road, it means building alliances with other pro Liberal groups like Australian Christian Nation and the Christian Democratic Party. This is supposedly the mainstream option. It is – on our assessment – the road to nowhere.

The anti Islam routine usually leads to blocs being made with people who have no commitment to any real idea that the Australian People are a nationality. Rather these ‘allies’ bleat that the Moslems should be turned into Australians by Christian conversion and civic training. Their logic as applied to Moslems is held with the same vehemence towards anyone else. As allies for supposed nationalists, they are worse than useless. In this regard, I note that the United Conservatives declaim against any European ethnic basis of Australian nationality in any case; the Protectionists are still coy, if only because they had partial origins inside the womb of nationalist politics, but as time goes on, they will turn to the easy path. One Nation is divided on the matter. But the con stands – that these allies will bring masses and people may kid themselves that they are part of a real mass movement. The civic patriot danger exists for One Nation absolutely and not just for a chunk of it.

It follows too, that by taking this civic patriot road of praising flags and constitutions alone rather than our European blood, one gets close to the conservative faction of the Liberal Party. We note that the Liberals’ conservatism does not extend to defence of Australian Nationality – only to its civic forms.

The old One Nation in some States, but particularly in New South Wales, may find itself enmeshed in the Liberal Right. Some of its factional leaders have built close links with the Christian Nation group and the Christian Democrats, conduits for the Liberal Party. They are continuing to develop these links.

Three Stooges?

Dearly would the liberal Party like to possess these named groups as a three-stooges-act. There are dangers that they may be successful in the plan.

By ensuring groups fly false signals, the Liberal game-players understand that they also demobilise the developing nationalist people’s movement.

They have not reckoned on the resolve of Australia First to do what must be done.

Nationalists will maintain their independence and their initiative at all times. We refuse to be co-opted into the Liberals’ game and we will always be at liberty to act in the interest of all Australians. Against the Liberal ethos of high immigration, globalist economics, free market labour rules, war for the New World Order and so forth, we offer the vision of an Australian Australia, Australian identity, independence and freedom.

The reactionary minded can follow Abbott if they wish, under any self-deception that moves them, but Australia First will reject the Liberal Party’s game today, tomorrow, always.

21 May 2010

Australian Electoral Commission Advertises Nationally Our Party Registration Application

The Federal party registration application was advertised nationally last Wednesday. This is the last hurdle on the way to our ‘legalization’ as a party. “Objections” to our registration are invited. We expect that there will be the usual “objections” that carry no legal weight. The party Management Committee expects registration about July 1.

Blue Mountains Press release.

Australia First Supports Mick Saunders For Penrith / Australia First Politics Comes To The Blue Mountains
May 19 2010

The Australia First Party will sponsor Mr. Mick Saunders for the by-election in the New South Wales seat of Penrith on June 19. The electorate covers lower Blue Mountains areas such as Lapstone and Glenbrook.

Australia First Party will field Mr. Saunders in Lindsay (an electorate that subsumes Penrith) in the Federal poll later this year.

The party will be registered Federally by then (the party application for registration is now in the public consultation phase), but it is not registered for State elections.

The party is registered for Council polls in New South Wales and will field Mr. Tony Pettitt for Hawkesbury Council also on June 19.

Mr. Mick Saunders said today:

“I am pleased to be able to represent Australian workers, small business people and other working Australians on the ballot on June 19. I believe that voters are tired of machine politics. Where I encounter ordinary people I’m told: “why vote Laber-al? what’s the point?” I agree. In this poll, I will be aiming to put into words what people are thinking on matters of real importance.”

Dr. Jim Saleam, chairman of the party in New South Wales added today:

“The Saunders campaign will be the first real occasion to interest Blue Mountains people in the politics of Australia First. We have initiated a group in the Mountains and a blogsite to express our views. We are certain to tap into groups outside of the major parties and the Greens”.

Mick Saunders concluded:

“I expect that the Greens will have much to say against Australia First. I reject any idea that the Greens are really an environmentalist party. They are a humanist party. I suppose that whenever the interests of a koala or a refugee stand in opposition, the koala loses every time. Rather than defend the Australian ecosystem, these folks, despite some noises, refuse to address the question of population. Their sanctimonious morality doesn’t cut it. We hope to force this question onto the agenda.”

The Mick Saunders campaign leaflet which will appear in letterboxes from this weekend says:

Penrith has seen corruption and now it deserves honesty. That can’t come from the Lab/Lib politicians. We need a worker in parliament.

Mick Saunders is 52 yrs and has lived most of his life in Western Sydney. He is married with three children. Mick has served in the Australian Army and has worked in the railway at Penrith.

In July 2008, as the New South Wales co-ordinator of the National Truck Shutdown, he defended the interests of Australian truckies against unfair work practices which undermined livelihoods and job independence.

A People’s Programme

1. There is an open plan to explode the population of Western Sydney. Land can be acquired by force and sold off to developers. Stop this population explosion and the immigration invasion of our suburbs!

2. Public assets should remain in public hands. Get back what has been stolen!

3. Citizens’ Initiated Referenda. That means people can propose laws and have them voted on. That’s real democracy!

4. End the road tolls. Take State taxes off fuel. No more private roadways. Make road rules ‘national’ so they don’t vary State to State.

5. Corruption? Make the guilty pay back the community in full


Australia First Party Nominates Tony Pettitt For Hawkesbury Council May 19 2010

The Australia First Party has nominated Mr. Tony Pettitt for Hawkesbury Council in the June 19 poll.

Australia First Party will field Mr. Pettitt in Greenway (an electorate that is now just south of Hawkesbury) in the Federal poll later this year.

The party will be registered Federally by then (the party application for registration is now in the public consultation phase), but it is not registered for State elections. The party is registered for Council polls in New South Wales.

The party will sponsor Mr. Mick Saunders for the Penrith by-election also on June 19.

Mr. Pettitt said today:

““I am pleased to represent Australian workers, small business people and other working Australians on the ballot on June 19. If Hawkesbury doesn’t fight the immigration driven disaster that is looming, we will see the destruction of one of Australia’s key food-producing areas. And for what? For the big Australia idea of the major parties – and I certainly include the Liberals here.”

Tony Pettitt concluded:

“I expect that the Greens will have much to say against Australia First. The Greens are not really an environmentalist party. They are a humanist party. They do not really defend the Australian ecosystem, because, despite some noises, they refuse to address the question of population. They refuse to demand an end of immigration. That also means an end to the refugee intake and the return of illegal arrivals.. There is nothing ‘moral’ in the refugee intake. The Greens sanctimonious morality doesn’t cut it with me. I intend to force this question onto the agenda. The Hawkesbury is at stake and this is a big test for the Greens. I have no doubt they will stand for immigration and refugees. Tell that to the farming groups.”

A campaign leaflet will start to appear in Hawkesbury letterboxes this weekend. It says:

It is in your interest and in your family’s interest, to cast a vote for the Australia First Party candidate, Tony Pettitt, in the Hawkesbury Council poll on June 19 2010.

Why? North-Western Sydney is under attack. We mean there are big plans to explode the population. Someone must act in our defence!

Under State laws, the government can acquire your land by compulsion and sell it to developers, who can then construct the monstrosity-suburbs that drive an immigration-driven population explosion. They make millions. You get the market price or less - and eviction. Agricultural land will be lost forever!

Tony Pettitt says no!

It’s no because it will destroy the rural quality of life in Hawkesbury. It’s no because it will undermine the environmental quality of the Hawkesbury. It’s no because it will finish off livelihoods - like the market-gardens. It’s no because it will destroy the cultural heritage our forebears gave us. It’s no because it means there is to be no future for Australians in the alien Australia that big business and politicians are doing their best to create.

If elected, Tony Pettitt will be a fighting representative for you, a councillor who will use his office to serve Hawkesbury. He will lobby to bring in Citizens’ Initiated Referenda, the policy that allows you to directly propose and vote on binding ‘laws’ for Council.

Who Is Tony Pettitt?

Tony Pettitt is 55 yrs and has lived most of his life in North West Sydney With a wide work experience, he is currently a truck owner / driver.

Tony Pettitt : 0408 381 211


19 May 2010

The Voice - 2010 : The Invasion (Video)

During 2009 2,727 so-called asylum seekers illegally entered Australian waters on 62 boats. This year the invaders prompted by Chairman KRudd's open border policies have taken up the challenge and stepped it up a few notches. In fact after just 136 days of 2010 last year's numbers were eclipsed.

The cost to the Australian taxpayer is horrendous considering that it costs $80,000 just to process each invader's claim for asylum. Then on top of that once they are released into the community which over 95% are we are lumbered with the costs of providing the invaders with dole payments, public housing and access to our already crumbing hospital system. With each boat that illegally enters our waters more invaders are encouraged to make the journey so they can have a free ride for life at our expense. It is not enough that they have ruined their own countries but certain people will not be happy until Australia is a third world sewer.

Enough is enough, it is time for the people of Australia to shatter the shackles of political correctness to save the country that our ancestors fought and died for. We must never forget one thing and that is charity begins and ends at home!

07 May 2010

The Voice - No Free Speech

During a recent cyber-racism summit Australia's Attorney-General Robert McClelland stated that there should be no free speech for so-called racists. Racists are by definition anyone who is White that disagrees with the government's policy of enforced diversity and multiculturalism. McClelland has us at the tip of a very slippery slope where the government will be able to do as it pleases and anyone who is vocal in their disagreement or concerns will be locked up or worse.

Free speech is supposed to be the cornerstone of democracy but without it all we are left with is tyranny. This one act shows the true colours of our fabian marxist Prime Minister Kevin Rudd (aka Chairman KRudd). We are being treated as mere commodities much like cattle who eventually end up at the abattoir. Are you outraged by this or are you too apathetic to get off your lounge chair? It is time that we pulled our fingers out otherwise we are doomed.

01 May 2010

Stop White Genocide in South Africa!

Warning some scenes and the truth may be disturbing to some viewers.